All persistent systems—biological, cognitive, social, and institutional—maintain viability through feedback and proportional correction within finite limits. Humans are distinct only in that action generation and feedback interpretation arise from the same self-referential system, leaving no internal access to objective ground truth. As a result, alignment cannot be directly known and is instead inferred through prediction error, experienced as meaning when coherence is maintained and distress when mismatch persists. Stability is preserved when feedback remains legible, actionable, and affordable; instability arises when correction is delayed, suppressed, or externalized. Across scales, systems that honor feedback early correct gently, while systems that block correction accumulate error until collapse substitutes for choice.
There are many different ways at looking at things to get to the truth. Give It to Got has its own way of interpreting problems and cancers one them.
Water is a another great example of this theory as well. Not just because it always finds level either. Here is a deeper dive into this perspective.
We're not up for the Clay Mathematics Institute Prize or anything, but if you take a look at what we got, it could help your business more than you know.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.